The fight going on now has everything to do with the difference between a constitutional republic and an absolute democracy
What you are seeing is a point in americana where the law is becoming less relevant in some people’s minds in favor of something grounded in controlling thought, stopping free action, and making it inappropriate socially to question the elite tier.
To them it’s about feelings and soft concepts like unity.
But ask yourself, what is the consistent glue that is being talked about here?
There is none. That is the point.
They want the masses confused about their rights, while being addicted to an emotional high similar to the Serotonin effect one gets from the constant staring at a computer screen.
There is an appreciable high when you are absorbed by the masses, yelling along with their cause. But the downer comes when you realize you are no longer an individual. Don’t try and question any of their actions or you will be promptly cut off. You have lost independence to become part of the unity.
So where is the relevance of this and the ultimate difference between a constitutional republic and an absolute democracy?
In an absolute democracy, you have the will of the masses. What they want becomes acceptable. You can go from thinking marriage is heterosexual and monogamistic in one decade, but then something that is loosely defined and subject to the interpretation of what gender people think they are the next. The Jews in Nazi Germany, as well as homosexuals and gypsies and others, became second-class citizens and many were murdered by democratic idealists.
And those leading these groups capitalize on the fact that the people are subject to the influences of key information distribution nodes. You actually lose the need to win over the masses; you just need to know how to program them into compliance.
For example, look at the MSM now. They declared before any states were certified who they feel has won the election. Now ask yourself: what happens if legal processes prove them wrong?
This cannot be allowed to happen, right?
So what happens in a constitutional republic? The laws matter. There is consistency, and what is right is defined. Its not necessarily immutable, but it is more stable and less susceptible to unusual perturbation. I mean if you look at the 18th and 21st amendments its not immune, but you know what your rights are. And the best part is it can and should be applied equally to both sides of the political spectrum.
So when you get cornered and asked about why you are in favor of a recount and against unity, ask them back this simple question: why do you feel you cannot win legally but only when politics are involved and social pressure makes us give up what is legally appropriate when there is doubt?
